The technological review for cataloguing covers a subset of the differents concepts to be managed in catalogues, as seen in requirement section.
Activity and event logs have not been considered in the technology review because the subject is not mature enough in RI and ICT to manage this information in catalogue yet. As a matter of priority, we focus on references and federated catalogues described above.
The review gives an overview of the software applications or systems and interface standards used for cataloguing related information.
The review of this topic will be organised by in consultation with the following volunteers: Type @ followed by first letters of person's name. They will partition the exploration and gathering of information and collaborate on the analysis and formulation of the initial report. Record details of the major steps in the change history table below.For further details of the complete procedure see item 4 on the Getting Started page.
Note: Do not record editorial / typographical changes. Only record significant changes of content.
|Date||Name||Institution||Nature of the information added / changed|
|date||Acronym of institution||A remark on the information added or changed|
The standards considered are provided by the follwing bodies:
RDA working groups (e.g. metadata) as well as domain specific standards (cerif, geoscienceml, …) are also considered.
The tools are open-source or not. They might be desktop or server side (with web interface) software.
Overall solutions: CERIF proposed by EPOS provides an overall conceptual model for managing the above information.
To BE completed
One paragraph describing the current state of the art.
Paragraph(s) describing a trend(s).
A short paragraph describing a problem to be overcome or barrier in the way of progress.
Please supply here any additional information that can help to justify the previous section e.g., references to material that someone can look up for themselves.
e.g., 5-10 years ahead. Your best judgement about the future direction of technology and research trends (0.5 - 1 page).
Link your analysis of the topic with particular identified requirements and use cases, as this will increase the relevance and help others understand your insights. Consider using tables to do this (0.5 - 1 page).
This section should be suitable for the deliverable and also understandable on its own, without the need to read the rest of the material. A discussion of areas where ENVRIplus should change its plans as a result of your conclusions, and of open questions would be very useful here (0.25 - 0.5 pages)
Insert numbered list of sources / references.